Legislators could also compromise by approving a watered-down version of civil unions that affirms gay partnerships but reserves some marital rights for heterosexual couples only. That version would permit same-sex couples or family members to enter into a relationship that provides hospital visitation, inheritance and auto insurance benefits but denies adoption and other parental rights. Additional rights such as health and tax benefits could be added.
Sen. Will Espero, who suggested the amendment and would vote against the current civil unions bill, said the compromise means opponents couldn't argue that civil unions are the same as marriage.
"There's not a sense of rushing and immediacy. We want to do it properly and in a manner we can all get behind," said Espero, a Democrat. "We understand how sensitive the issue is."
Other senators have said amending the bill would ruin its chances of passage because that would open a new round of negotiations in committee.
A compromise also may be untenable to the gay community, said Alan Spector, co-chair of the Family Equality Coalition.
"How does one compromise on equality and civil rights? We're being asked to accept less than equality," Spector said.
[Read the article or read more articles from AP.]